Month: May 2006

  • X-Men Fans Be Warned

    Overall Rating  Somewhere in the C to D- range
    Minor Spoilers ahead:

    Take this is a warning, if you watch X-men 3 The Last Stand and are a fan the x-men be prepared for your favorite character to either: 1. be
    mysterious and inexplicity absent in the movie. 2. die pointlessly, 3.
    lose their powers as a cheesy plot device, 4. have zero character
    development and almost no lines in the entire movie, or 5. prove to be
    completely irrelevant during all combat scenes in the movie.

    And many characters experience multiple of these afflictions. The
    *only* character that comes off ok is everyone’s favorite Wolverine. So
    unless the only character you like in the series is Wolverine you will
    probably be woefully disappointed in this movie. I apologize for any
    minor spoilers I might provide, but I feel it is absolutely necessary
    that you be warned. This movie is not just the worst of any of the
    x-men movies, it’s one of the worst movie stories I’ve ever seen. This
    isn’t just about going against the cannon, even ignoring all of the
    established literature of the x-universe this movie just flops on its
    own rights. It’s StarWars Episode II bad. Maybe even worse.

    Ok, maybe’s that’s a little too harsh. There are some good points. They
    did a better than expected job with Beast. Iceman does get to shine a
    little and Shadowcat does do something although it is a rather
    unrealistic victory for her. Pyro proves to have grown some strength.
    Storm has more of a role, well at least more lines. But she still is
    woefully underpowered compared to her comic book incarnation as are
    many of the other characters as well. But everyone else? Irrelevant or
    worse than irrelevant in many cases.

    The casting as always is superb. The acting of characters like Magento
    and Wolverine are still just as convincing as always. The dialogue is
    well put together and of course the special effects are impressive. The
    subtle humor of the first two movies is also still present and quite
    well done as well.

    Where he movie fails almost entirely on plot alone. It is unfulfilling.
    It will leave a bitter taste in your mouth. The more you think about it
    the more you’ll wish the movie had never been made in the first place
    rather than be such a poor vehicle for the development of the
    characters you love. It would have been better to imagine what was
    going to happen after the second movie then to know what happens and
    know that it is… this!

    The movie builds up your expectations so much and there’s so much going
    on at the beginning that you will probably start off being impressed.
    There are some early scenes that are good enough to stick with you.
    They even excite you about the direction the series is going. This only
    makes the eventual let down all the worse. When you come to realize “no
    that character you like isn’t coming back”, and “no their death isn’t
    going to have served any purpose” and “no your favorite character isn’t
    going to contribute to the battle when the fate of the world is at
    stake”, and “no your favorite character isn’t going to have more than
    the two lines he’s already spoken in the movie” that you start to
    realize that something is horribly wrong here. So many minor changes
    could have been made to drastically improve the quality of the story.
    So many plot leads could have been fulfilled in interesting and
    impressive ways at the end to make the whole thing worth while.

    But alas it is not to be. There will be no twists. No surprises.
    Everything will be resolved in the simplest way imaginable making you
    wonder why you even bothered to watch. The villains will prove to be
    hardly a threat at all really and the good guys who are left will
    really never be in any real danger since the movies uber threat really
    isn’t all that bad after all. And numerous elements of the plot will
    just remain completely unresolved as if the writers didn’t have any
    time or inclination to explore those elements of the story in depth or
    even give us one incling of what is going to happen.

    I would have expected more from the story of the phoenix. I would have
    expected more from a plot revolving around the discovery of a potential
    cure for the so called mutant epidemic. Maybe the problem is that they
    tried to put both of these elements in the movie at the same time and
    thus failed to do either justice. OR maybe the writers just tackled a
    story beyond their ability to write. Understandable, but sad as that
    means we have to accept this garbage as the third movie in what was
    otherwise an excellent series.

    I’m not saying that this movie cannot be enjoyed, but to all x-fans out
    there I highly recommend you don’t watch it immediately. And when you do watch it. Lower. Your. Expectations. Set your
    expectations at the very pit of low. Spend some time imagining the worst that could
    happen, how terribly they could possibly screw it up. Then watch it, preferably
    when it becomes on television, and then just maybe you’ll be pleasantly
    surprised that it isn’t as bad as you had feared and you’ll be able to
    see the few good points in it. Or maybe not. In any case at least you
    will not have wasted your hard earned money on a movie that is
    altogther unworthy of remembrance.

    By the way if you ignore my advice you should stay and watch until after the credits end if you can stomach it. There is an extra scene. I didn’t stay. I was too disgusted but I read about it and I doubt I would have cared.

    Now below I’ll detail more of the specific problems for those who have been foolish enough to watch the movie as I was.

    DETAILED SPOILER WARNINGS

    DETAILED SPOILER WARNINGS

    DETAILED SPOILER WARNINGS

    DETAILED SPOILER WARNINGS

    DETAILED SPOILER WARNINGS


    DETAILED SPOILER WARNINGS

    Ok let’s just go character by character shall we?

    Absentees:

    Nightcrawler -  So apparently after all the stuff in the last movie, Nightcrawler just kinda went home and didn’t come back. Even with a world wide threat he doesn’t even show up for a cameo appearence. What’s he doing?  It’s not like he can’t get there fast enough.He can teleport!

    Sabretooth – Well I can’t remember whether he was supposed to be dead but I find it hard to believe anything they’ve shown can kill him. He would have been a better villain to have then some of the chumps Magneto recruits. Heck Toad would have been better.

    Jubilee – she had a cameo in movie 2 but doesn’t show up in movie 3. I guess she’s just in classes….

    Siryn – also still in classes I guess. Ummm. why would the x-men go off to fight a war against an army of mutants and not at least try to find something other mutants with combat skills to help out either in their school or their friends in the world. We at least know they could have went and grabbed Siry and Jubilee since we know they’re at the school, gave Nightcrawler a call, not to mention dozens of other students or friends of the x-men in the universe.

    Lady Deathstrike – ok so maybe its a good thing they didn’t find some cheesy way to bring some characters back….

    Characters that Could have been it:
    Quicksilver, The Scarlet Witch -  brotherhood of evil mutants and all these two might have created a better villain squad then we are left with.

    Gambit – I’m kinda glad they left him out so they couldn’t ruin him. Same goes for nightcrawler really. But they DID have his file in the second movie. I guess it was just to get our hopes up.

    The New -
    Juggernaut – “I’m the Juggernaut!” Please. This is no juggernaut I know. No character development whatsoever. He just runs through walls and gets easily defeated by Kitty Pryde somehow. Yeah right.  This is a villain powerful enough to deserve his own movie and they just made him into a waste of space. At least he didn’t appear to die which would have been absurd. Juggernaut is not supposed to be a mutant and he’s supposed to have significant connection to Charles Xavier. But not in this movie.

    Angel -  They build him up at the beginning. One of the only characters to have a flashback scene. So why is it that he does NOTHING! He contributes not at all to the fight at the end, flies off the screen just so you can look at his wings. Big deal. Would it have been so hard for him to contribute just a little itsy bit? Character development but no combat? What’s up with that? I don’t like Angel that much, but again this is a case where a character didn’t even need to be in the movie.

    Multiple Man – He’s extremely powerful, why on god’s green earth would Magneto just leave him behind as a decoy? And why a decoy with no purpose. Magneto doesn’t ambush the guys. attacking him or take them hostage. No he just lets Multiple man get captured. Unbelievable.

    Spike – Nice death. Excuse for Wolverine to fight  somebody. You were irrelevant.

    Arclight – Nice death. Irrelevant.

    Kid Omega aka that Quill Guy – Nice death. Chump. Irrelevant

    Psylocke – I read that she was in the movie, was she really in the movie? I didn’t notice. She must have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.  Probably died with the other chump villians. In that case, Nice Death. Irrelevant.

    Jimmy/Leech – well it’s neat that this character is the source of the cure and all but you’d think that’d mean he I don’t know might have some kind of a role. But no alas. Irrelevant. At least he didn’t die.

    Callisto – Ok, I guess they did this character ok. I don’t know much about Callisto. Her fighting Storm was appropriate. It should have been trivial for Storm to defeat even with the new power set she demonstrates in the movie. It’s not like fighting the Flash. Still at least she was a villain that did something.

    Trask – He didn’t die but that doesn’t mean he wasn’t irrelevant. A shame too, had they played up the whole humans versus mutants thing with the cure and all, he might have had a bigger role and they could have even lead into the sentinel saga. But no. They were too busy screwing up the Phoenix to be bothered.

    Moira MacTaggert – Actually not bad cameos. Good foreshadowing here. No complaints.

    The Beast – He had a cameo in movie 2 really so not that new. Anyway he’s the best of the new characters. They actually did his character perfectly. I have no complaints here.

    The Established Characters -

    Kitty Pryde – All we learn about her is
    that shy ice skates and misses home. Please. She does have some cool
    fight scenes so it isn’t a total waste. I’m not a big fan of the comic
    character so I don’t have any particular complaints here but there
    definitely was room for more character development.

    Collosus  -  Collosus beats some guys up and throws wolverine and doesn’t say more than 2 lines in the entire movie. Again. Come on! This is a pretty substantial character in the comic books and he’s supposed to have a relationship with Kitty Pryde who is also in this movie. But no, he could have easily been any other character as he was pretty much just there for the ride.

    Mystique -  What an awesome character. She’s very evil and very well done at the beginning. I was getting pretty excited about her role in this movie. Then. Oops, let’s completely remove her from relevance in one foul swoop. The writers must have said, “What will Mystique be doing in the last battle? I don’t know. Ok then I guess we’ll just have her lose her powers that way we don’t have to be bothered.” What a cop out.  Still, overall in the movie world between the three movies she isn’t badly done. The comic book character is more interesting though.

    Cyclops – Nice death. chump. You were irrelevant. Hey wait just a frickin minute. This is CYCLOPS we’re talking about. Signficant character in just about every single x-men plotline in which he exists. Now’s he’s the broken down wreck who dies just so Jean can have something to regret. Indeed if you told me the plot of the x-men movie would involve A. a mutant cure (something cyclops more than most characters would want) or B. Jean’s transformation into the Phoenix the very last thing I would expect is for Cyclops to have almost NO role. I’m not a big fan of cyclops but come on. That’s just absurd. An entirely pointless death after having almost no role in movies one or two. Poor cyclops gets the total shaft in the movie universe.

    Iceman – One of the better done characters. I like that he develops his ice around his body ability, gets to defeat pyro AND actually has some small amount of character development outside of combat. His relationship with rogue is rather unresolved. He kinda just gives up and goes back home when he went out to look for her. What’s up with that?

    Rogue – This was just terrible. She just goes off and gets cured and that’s ALL she does in the entire movie. Her friends are fighting and dying out there and she never shows up to help? She was even training with them early on. Did that mean nothing? What a waste of a powerful and interesitng character. It’s again like the writers and directors were thinking “How do we incorporate Rogue into the final battle? Beats me. I know,let’s just have her leave and get her powers removed then we don’t have to be bothered by it. Great Idea!”  Ugh. Yuck. Rogue would have been a great character to use during the final battle. She would have given them both a more realistic out with either Magneto or Phoenix. Or she could have just contributed to the fighitng any of the other villains such as Arclight or Psylocke. Nope she does nothing. Why was she even in the movie?

    Pyro -  I kinda like the evolution of this character in the movie. He’s kindof a neat lieutenant for Magneto and they did make him pretty darn strong. Magneto considers him a substantive enough weapon to hold him back until the very end. That’s cool. Then he wastes him by sending him off to fight a man made of ice. Nice battle. Should have never happened though. But still it makes sense for Pyro’s pride and arrogance to cause his defeat. I just expected better use of his troops by Magneto. Sigh.

    Storm – Yay! They gave Storm a bigger role. But wait. She still does NOTHING. She’s there sure. Fighting with everyone else. She beats up on Callisto. And she’s theoretically in a leadership position like she’s supposed to be. She takes control of the school which makes sense given the loss of Scott. However… During the battle she doesn’t issue commands, she doesn’t take charge and her only singificance during the battle with Magneto is that she creates some cover. Come on! This is one of the most powerful characters in the x-universe. She can do better than that. Trying to pur her on par with Callisto is lame.

    Xavier – I felt in physical pain with the way they portrayed this character. Now don’t get me wrong. Xavier’s hard to do. There’s the whole fact that he makes many of the battles too easy so they constantly have to remove him from the picture. However, this wasn’t one of those easy battles. Magneto AND Phoenix? No need to remove him from such a conflict. There’s also the whole moral ambiguity of Xavier’s existence.  There’s always that question of conscience in the comic books. How far will he go for his morals? Does he play god with people’s lives? Yes that element was well represented here. Too bad there wasn’t anything else. Xavier does nothing cool in this movie. He might as well have not been in it at all. He exists long enough to have a disturbing death but in the end Jean doesn’t remember his words. He doesn’t contribute to Jean’s defeat not in astral form and not in memory. Rather he’s pretty much just the cause of the problem and that’s about it. This fact makes it even worse that he returns at the end of the credit. If we were about to be willing to forgive him for his overly arrogant manipulation of people’s lives when he locked Jean’s subconscious, no point in speaking poorly of the dead and all, but he goes and does something equally quetionable in taking over another person’s body. It would have been different had he done this to contribute. Had he appeared in the end in his new body and helped to defeat the now out of control Jean. But no. He does nothing.There’s no resolution here. No forgiveness. They just let him live to serve as a kind of fan service at the end. I would have preferred they just killed him.

    Magneto  -  How can anyone dislike Ian McKellen’s performance. He is the perfect Magneto. His dialogue is flawless. Every line is memorable. Every expression on his face just makes the character.  And yet… When did Magneto become so weak and stupid? Sure he had that cool scene  where he frees Mystique and moving the bridge was one of the few awesome single  character displays of power which harkened back to the other movies, but then there’s that last battle which pretty much ruins it all. I though he was supposed to be good at Chess? Seems to me that Magneto’s idea of playing chess is to never use his queen, send all of his knight, rooks, and bishops off so that they can’t contribute to the battle and have his pawns commit suicide.  Brilliant. Sure I can see him sending in the pawns first but he should have I don’t know, done *something* when they are being shot and turned into humans. But he just sits there for quite some time before finally deciding to let arclight destroy the guns. Then the x-men are fighting and he still does nothing, but for some reason he sends ALL of his lieutenants inside the building where they can do the oh so relevant job of killing a doctor and a millionaire while the X-men are wiping out his entire army. How on earth does that make sense?  But even doing that might not have been so bad if he’d used his ridiculous powers to take on all of the X-men. He SHOULD be strong enough to give the entire group of x-men a run for their money. He can do a heck of a lot more than throw car bombs at people. Sadly, instead he just falls for the oldest trick in the book and has his powers removed then runs away. What a sad and stupid way for Magneto of all people to be defeated.  Oh and besides that he made about 3 other stupid decisiions earlier. One he just leave’s mystique so she can betray him. Two he leaves multiple man behind and does use him. Three he doesn’t capture or kill wolverine but rather just lets him escape to tell the x-men their plan. What the!?!?! Magneto is supposed to be smarter than that.  In this movie he seems to rely too much on  the fact that he has Jean and figures his victory is predetermined but he doesn’t even ask Jean to do anything for him. At least if Jean had refused maybe he would have been encouraged to take matters into his own hands earleir.  Protecting his troops and ensuring his victory.  Oh and how come he didn’t realize the guns were plastic right away? I thought he could sense metal. Overall Magneto seems no stronger in this movie than his underlings except when he moves the bridge, which probably really wasn’t all that necessary. So lame.  The only redeeming element is that at the end they show Magneto regaining his powers first before anyone else even after having been stabbed with like 5 of those things, even though it was just a little bit. That’s cool. Also the scene with him in the park playing chess just perfectly fits his character. I don’t know what I would have done had they just ended the movie leaving you to assume that Magneto, Mystique and Rogue had all lost their powers permanently. I think something inside of me would have snapped. I think there would have been some kind of a riot.  Luckily they didn’t go that far.

    Wolverine -  ITt’s hard to mess up wolverine when they’ve already got the ideal actor for him. His introductory scene in this movie was really cool in the danger room with the lighting of the cigar and all. Unfortunately that’s where his coolness ends. Oh don’t get me wrong, he is relevant throughout the entire movie. He plays a signifcant combat role in defeating all of the major threats and there’s character development for his character as well. Well… more like character continuity. No real new ground with his character is established except that maybe he’s a little more loyal to the x-men. Maybe a little too loyal to the x-men really. He’s supposed to be the loner character. Going too far from that is bad news. He’s almost a little on the wimpy side in this. Nicer than he’s supposed to be. And yet…. he totally just stabs and kills Jean. WTF. He’s not supposed to be able to make himself do that. They made it a little tough for him but he still does it. It’s pretty screwed up. He doesn’t try to knock her out first or talk her out of it. He just kills her. No time left in the movie. Stab. Dead. The End.   Oh wait a minute Wolverine, we had these mutant cure vials lying around that we would have used to suppress Jeans power and thus not had to kill her. Shhh! No one’s supposed to realize that.  No more than they are supposed to realize that demolecularization probably can’t be stopped by awesome regeneration.

    Jean -  The focus of the movie and yet sooo poorly done. One the phoenix is supposed to be more powerful than that. But that didn’t bother me so much. The real problem here is that the pheonix is supposed to be more INTERESTING than that. She starts off doing some stuff, you know demolecularizing people and all, but after those couple of scenes of getting rid of excess characters for the lazy writers, she just STANDS there the rest of the movie. Unbridled emotions are pretty boring these days I guess. She’s more of a zombie than person. She doesn’t seem all that conflicted nor all that passionate. I’d expect her to be taking pleasure is fighting at the end contributing to the battle. Laughing or at least I don’t know Saying Something. They could have given her a child like personality and had her take childish glee in the things she did. Or they could have given her the truly evil witch like personality and had her explore her hatred and disgust and be blasting people to smitherines enemy and ally alike. But no. She does nothing. Until the very end when they are about to shoot her, then  she starts demolecularizing people and things again. How boring we’ve already saw that. How very convenient that she kills the other villains that the writers didn’t have time to get rid of.  But then after all that, she just gets stabbed by Wolverine. She should have just flicked Wolverine have way across the globe with her telekinesis even if she can’t demolecularize him. She could also have created an impenetrable force field rather easily. If she’s going to let him through so that he could stab her they would have made it more difficult. They should have shown much more of her inner emotional and mental conflict. Heck she could have been struggling the whole movie to control her powers. She could have remembered Xavier’s words or Xavier could have appeared to help or Xavier could have appeared in astral form to help. Or Scott could have returned to contribute. Or Rogue could have touched her and stolen some of her powers. Or should could have been stabbed by the ‘cure’ and thus been weakend but we could have learned that her power is so far off the chart that the cure could not suppress her. Or leech could have confronted her and she would have faced the moral dillemma of having to kill a child, a child who conveniently would have weakened her powers helping Wolverine get closer. Any or all of those things would have made it more realistic in my mind. A flashback. Anything. Anything at all. All we get is the characters eyes to hint at the conflict within. It’s not enough for me to suspend my disbelief. Also if the Phoenix really is just a subconscious manifestation of her power in this movie, why couldn’t the professor have jumped in Cererbral magnified his powers by I don’t know how much and then re-established the lockdown on her mind. Can it really be that hard? Why couldn’t we have had scenes where Jean is herself for extended periods of time and the the phoenix during others? Why couldn’t the whole thing have been more subtle and interesting? Why did I feel as if the phoenix was never all that dangerous in this movie? Why did I just not care what happened to her by the end of it? Why? Because the phoenix is a chump in this movie. Nice Death. You should have just stayed dead after the second movie.

    *************************

    Overally I hated this movie. I am bitterly angry at the creators and directory.

    The movie has the style but not the sensibilities of the first two movies. Whereas the first two movies are all about paying homage to the characters, making you care about them, bringing them to life on the big screen, this movie is about bang boom special effects with no substance. The first two movies elegantly give each character a scene in which to shine. Xavier freezes everyone in the mall. Nightcrawler beats up on the secret service. Jean holds back the water. Wolverine fights lady deathstrike and sabretooth and has the bullet pop out of his head when shot by the cops. Storm brings lightining down when being chocked by sabretooth. Rogue steals pyro’s powers to prevent him from killing the police. Mystique’s solo entry into the facility takes out the guards and lets everyone else in. Magneto’s escape from his plastic prison. The scene where Magneto turns all of the guns on the police while Charles controls Sabretooth’s mind.  You don’t forget these scenes. They stand out. their memorable. They matter to you. In this movie the characters exhibit their powers but they aren’t center stage. It doesn’t really matter. It’s just a series of brawls and street fights. Could have been any other mutants.  Could have been just normal people. It would have been largely the same. You don’t get that sense of wonder and awe. You don’t feel that glee and jubilation. You don’t think yes! now that’s how that character should be portrayed!  Character use their powers in this movie, but I just can’t bring myself to care.

    I really don’t know if I will watch anything else in the franchise. I’ll probably just stick to the comics. I can’t stand to be this disappointed again. It really is very very sad.I have rarely been this disappointed with a movie.  I just feel ill. All I can do is try and get others to not watch it so they don’t have to go through the same feelings of bitterness and regret that I have. Please please don’t watch this film if you love x-men. Do something else, anything else instead. Don’t do that to yourself. It isn’t worth it.

  • Poor Communication Skills

    Every once in a while I’ll read or hear a response to a comment that starts something like this:
    “Your comment shows a complete lack of understanding…”
    or
    “You clearly have little or know knowledge of the topic on which you are commenting. Those with experience about…”
    or
    “By stating <x>, you demonstrate your embarrasing lack of comprehension of the subject matter…”

    And so on…

    These kinds of comments enrage me. Often I agree with the comments that the person is making about the subject matter at hand, and often I do in fact disagree with the person being criticized, but I despise this method of communication. The comment seems directly designed to belittle the person to whom the writer is responding. It is almost as of the commentor is trying to build a bit of credability for his own comment and establish himself as more of an expert in the subject matter by attacking the comments of another. This is not just rude, it’s somewhat cruel. It brings to mind images of standing on top of others to get to your goal. It’s like grinding other people under your boot because you consider them less ‘worthy’ of consideration of than yourself. It’s selfish and in always wrong, imo.

    Now it is a little different when the comment is not a direct response to a comment by another but a response to a general group of comment. I find nothing at all offensive about asserting that all of the people who believe X are woefully ignorant of points A, B, and C. I strongly suspect that these kinds of communications are where this mode of speaking came about. Writers and thinkings and commentators might write or say something like “When critics of <A>  assert  <P>  they reveal themselves to have a complete and utter lack of comprehension of <Z>. They prove that they have none of the requisite experience in <W> to be able to judge matters of <R>”  and so on. Such comments are however general in nature. Though they do border on rudeness and there are probably better ways to express the same ideas, the comments are not personal, they are not attacking and individual and they are, usually, not meant to build personal credability.

    But the far more direct commentaries that have been born from this kind of thing are a different matter all together. Now it seems that people will drop this kind of statement at any time just for the whim of it on any subject matter that they have a passing degree of familiarity about or think that they do. And many a truely knowledgible expert will be even more forceful in their critical response and more offensive in their response. Often the comment that they are responding to isn’t even really an attempt to assert expertise of a subject matter. For example, if I read a comment on a web page and I respond something like “You wrote <A>, but I don’t see why <A> is true. In my experienced do <C>, <D>, and <E>,  <B> seemed to be true much of the time instead.”   Why would anyone take from sucha statement that I am trying to assert my expertise on the subject? I am mearly making a comment about the nature of my experiences and sharing my observations. I am perfectly fine with someone responding “In your experiences, <B> would indeed be true, however in experiences <X>, <Y>, and <Z> which are more common in contexts <P> and <Q> which are more relevant to most observers, you’d find that <A> holds a vast majority of the time.”   Unfortunately now’a'days the response you are much more likely to get would be “You’re experiences are irrelevant and you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. It is invalid for you to ciriticize the article writer on the basis of such flimsy experiences. How. Dare. You. Anyone with obviously relevant experiences in <X>, <Y>, and <Z> know well that <A> holds. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.” 

    Isn’t that strange? You’d think I had actually said something like “<A> is wrong. The writer is stupid. If you do <X>, <Y>, and <Z> clearly <B> is right. This fool should stop writing and anyone who agrees with him is a moron.”  But clearly I didn’t say anything of the kind, but that would indeed justify such a harsh response.

    It’s almost as if people are stuck in flame-response mode. Dialogue has gotten more and more critical over the last few years and disagreements about substantive issues are becoming more and more common. Communication is faster and easier about a great many subject matters in very short order. Whereas in the old days you could surround yourself with like minded people for a majority of your life, now if you spend even a brief amount of time communicating in the online world you will run right smack dab into thousands of contrasting opinions founded on the basis of drastically different life experiences. What’s more the exposure to so many competing ideas and opinions online causes even the people you meet in real life to have more varied opinions that might not fit in with your world view. People have a hard time handeling this shift. It is hard to adapt. I believe this is the very source of the advent of flaming online and I believe it is the source of the anti-flame mentality that is becoming more common day by day both online and in the real life.

    But I find it deeply disturbing to thing that these kinds of modes of communication might be becoming more and more socially acceptable. It’s as if people are no longer being offended by reading statements that start by referring to another by calling them completely witless. Or at least the embarrased or disturbed are afraid to comment because they manifestly don’t want to get into the uncomfortable experience of a flame war online any more than they want to get into an angry argument in person. But of course, to the person making the rude comment that makes them feel justified in their commentary. After all they ended the discussion while expressing opinions based on their own expertise and no one bothered to contradict them. Thus they would see themselves as having avoided a flame war and enlightened the ignorant at the same time. They don’t see it as having offended a person unjustly and ended what might have been a productive exchange of information.

    Really, how are we to learn if any attempt to present the knowledge we’ve gained from our own experiences is met with derision and scorn by those who have more knowledge? Doesn’t the path to knowledge begin by sharing your perspective continue on to discovering where and how and why you are wrong and then pass through the acquisition of more experiences that provide a greater understanding of the subject? If not that then I don’t know how you learn anything unless you simply take the word of the loudest and most obnoxious speaker as fact. Human nature is not like that though. Rudeness will just get people’s back up. I’m more inclined to believe and try to justify an irrational position if someone attacks me and calls me ignorant for having ever dared to express my position in the first place.

    Maybe we need to ask ourselves, why are we communicating? Is it to share our knowledge to others and perhaps gain some knowledge and understanding in the process or is it simply to prove to people how smart we are by making others look the fool?