June 18, 2007

  • i am a member of…

    OK, so I have accounts on….

    slashdot, youtube, linkedin, friendster, facebook, wikipedia,
    sourceforge, various google, various yahoo, various msn, skype, aol,
    amazon.com, icq,  xanga, blogger, ebay, livejournal, del.ico.us,
    schtuff, librarything, bookmooch, paperbackswap, zagat, digg, blip.tv,
    uncyclopedia, everything2, snapfish, fatwallet, SecondLife, and
    swaptree.

    And you know, those are only the ones I can remember off the top of my
    head and the ones I am willing to own up to. It also includes only
    primarily internet/networking based applications that allow you to
    connect or share in some way.  And it doesn’t take into account the
    fact that I keep multiple accounts on some of these services in order
    to achieve a certain degree of pseudo-anonymity at times. It’s an
    illusion of course. We are destined to have everything about us
    scattered to the winds for all to know.  That much is pretty much
    inevitable. Still, I like to segment off aspects of my personality into
    various identities as well. This helps keep me sane and makes it easier
    to write without having to worry about if I am contradicting myself too
    frequently.

    Anyway, many of the sites I have listed fall into certain categories ie
    ‘blogging sites’, ‘social networks’, ‘forums’, etc.  But really the
    differences between this plethora of applications seems to grow smaller
    every day. More and more are adding social networking capabilities,
    blogging capabilities, wiki capabilities, video sharing capabilities,
    reviewing capabilities, instant messaging capabilities, cell phone
    integration, etc. etc.  Currently most cater to a specific crowd or a
    specific area of expertise, but all are also trying to expand their
    membership to be as inclusive as possible. The more membership an
    application has, the more useful to users it becomes the more members
    it gets and so on.  I didn’t event mention any online gaming
    applications which can often be just as immersive and include as many
    of these connecting and sharing features as these other sites that
    focus only on those things do. (I am also a member of world of
    warcraft, guildwars, magic: the gathering online, xbox live, whatever
    that wii network is called, and I used to be on final fantasy xi)

    So eventually many will ask the obvious question, when exactly is
    enough enough? One could spend a life type traversiing the internet
    joining groups, building networks, meeting and interacting with people.
    You could have memberships in hundreds  of sites not even counting the
    necessary financial sites and online store memberships and online
    memberships in real world groups and organizations. One wonders, do we
    really need so many?

    Actually, it doesn’t really bother me that much, at least as far as the
    social sites go. They are all competing with one another and so far it
    appears that the best of class applications have been bubbling to the
    top and people just jump ship from the old apps to the new ones. They
    don’t get rid of their old accounts though, they just spend all their
    time on the newer better apps. Hence we end up with lots of discarded
    pieces of our identity scattered amongst decaying applications. That’s
    a little disturbing, but not particularly so. As long as the
    competition is fierce people will derive great benefit from these
    various tools to re-imagine and re-organize their lives and they will
    keep getting better. I do have a personal objection to how these apps
    in general lack decentralization and don’t even try to provide the
    option for anonymity. They’ve gotten better at letting you filter what
    you make visible to others, but there’s still much work to be done in
    that area. But all of those are minor details. Overall the applications
    are extraordinary and I say the more the merrier.

    But speaking of merry, one thing that bothers me is this. Why do so
    many of these apps seem so dang cheerful? I mean they’re all so bubbly
    and bright. Light and happy and pleasant in virtually every way. You
    would think from perusing the surface of these networks that the world
    is made out of sunshine and lolly pops. No suffering. Even the most
    serious of subjects is brightly serious. They exude the aura of “we’re
    all friends here, we get along with absolutely everybody!” And on top
    of that there’s an added aura of “We’re all happy successful people
    without a care in the world.” That’s why I feel a kind of cognitive
    dissonance when I peruse these networks. I like the atmosphere
    and I can’t for the life of me see a thing wrong with it, and yet this
    one aspect of it bothers me so.

    Probably the heart of it is, that the more main stream these software
    become, the more they reflect standard norms of social interaction.
    That is to say, you put your best foot forward and try to make a good
    impression and all that. So there’s a kind of carefulness, a respect
    and concern for appearances and interpretations that it seems to me
    that I have been rebelling against ever since I was a very small child.
    And no I don’t want to even begin to analyze the reasons behind that.
    Suffice it to say, I like it when people really don’t care what anyone
    thinks, rather than simply giving the appearance of being carefree. I
    would rather that people adapt to the uniqueness of others rather than
    try to make themselves less obviously unique in order to cause the
    least dissonance.

    This is not a criticism, just an observation, and perhaps even a flawed
    limited observation. As I dig deeper into these kinds of newly forming
    institutions I will find that they really are just as varied and
    complex and interesting as the real world upon which they are based. It
    may gall me to have to peal away the surface glitter, but it really is
    only the most minor of hardships.

    One thing for sure all of this is just one other aspect of how utterly
    extraordinary the internet really is. It is a unique new world that
    spawns a plethora of unique new worlds. I mean really what could
    possible be more awesome? 

    I am convinced that if humanity were to end tomorrow, a future species
    that evolve on this planet were to look back and study our
    accomplishments the one thing that we did that would most awe and
    impress them would be the creation of this amazing thing called the
    internet.  And if by some chance we as a species do survive for a few
    more millenia, I have little doubt that future historians will look
    back and determine that the major turning point that changed the future
    of humanity was of course the invention of the internet. Not traveling
    to the moon, not mastering electricity, not the invention of writing,
    not the establishment of governments and democracy. No. The internet
    and all that spawned from it. That will be the lasting most profoundly
    important development in the history of humanity so far. I am proud to
    have lived in such times as these, observing the creation of this new
    world order. And I can’t wait to see what happens next.

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *