November 8, 2007
-
Anger Thresholds
Here’s a theory. Everyone has a
different sort of anger threshold. For some that threshold is really
low. It doesn’t take much to make them angry and they show it pretty
quickly in whatever manner they usually demonstrate their anger, be it
through ranting or raging or going cold and silent or being cruel and
nasty or smashing things or slamming doors or whatever. For others the
threshold is really high. It takes a lot to get them angry and
circumstances that seem like they would piss them off just don’t seem
to phase them. They don’t show anger very often if at all because they
are rarely pushed to it.That much isn’t particularly
interesting, but let’s think about how people with various anger
thresholds are likely to interact with the world when they realize
where they stand on the continuum of anger thresholds. This is an
interesting question because I think most people are well aware of
whether they are quick to anger or of the less excitable type.In
my observations, the low anger threshold types tend to dislike the
frequency of their tendency to express anger. As a consequence they
tend to try and suppress their outward expressions of their anger. When
something ticks them off, inside they immediately blaze up in anger,
but they clamp it down with an iron will and try not to show it. This
is in large part because society tends to not treat people kindly who
are too quick to get angry. Often, in order to be successful, you need
to not appear as a person who quickly grows angry at things that others
perceive as not being too big a deal. On top of that, most people tend
to easily become hurt or upset when someone becomes angry at them
thinking that the person is judging them. So the low anger threshold
person who probably doesn’t intend to or feel good about hurting others
with their anger and probably wants to be successful will do what he or
she can to appear less angry than they actually are.Of course,
what happens when someone who is easily made angry spends so much
energy trying not to appear angry? Why it makes them angrier of
course! It must be extremely annoying to try and suppress your nature,
to conform to the opinions and perceptions of others just to make them
happy. Maybe at first it doesn’t bother you, but after living that
double life for a while it will build up and make you extremely
annoyed.Fairly frequently, quick-to-anger folks intuitively
come up with an ingenious solution to this problem. They tend to find
and become close to people with whom they feel comfortable expressing
their anger and whom they feel won’t judge them harshly because of it.
Then they take out their anger on those people in private whilst
maintaining an outward facade of never or at least less frequently
getting angry. This isn’t done out of a desire to cause harm or to use
the person at whom they are expressing their anger. Rather, it is the
natural consequence of the very human need to find a balance in one’s
life in a world that rejects fiery tempers out of hand. The more one is
forced to behave in a manner that is unnatural to them the more likely
the are to seek some sort of outlet wherein they can be themselves
again. That’s human nature.Those who are slow to anger on the
other hands develop a different attitude toward their anger tendencies
and act in a different manner to compensate. A high-threshold person
will fairly frequently develop a fear of the very thought of his or her
own anger threshold ever being breached. Having so little experience
being angry, one tends to not trust themselves and to fear what one
might do, what harm they might cause, if they were ever to get angry.As a result a person with a high-threshold will probably act in the
exact opposite manner to the actions of the low-threshold person. The
people with whom they are close will be the last ones they would allow
to see their angry side. Most often these persons will never allow
themselves to show their anger except when they are completely alone
and isolated, or if they cannot engineer such a situation they will
release their anger amongst strangers before they allow themselves to
express it with friends and family. When something breaches their anger
threshold or even if they start to see that something has become close
to breaching it while they are around someone they care about, their
instinctive reaction is to withdraw, to run away, to escape, to be by
themselves or become surrounded by others whom they care about a lot
less. They will become quiet and withdrawn if they cannot find a
recourse to escape and will focus all of their mental energies onto
keeping a hold of their temper until an opportunity arises where they
can release it without fear of letting someone they care about become
acquainted with this person that they become when their anger is upon
them.The low-threshold person will generally require a few close connections
to keep them entirely sane, but they will probably have very high
standards for who becomes such a connection. The person with whom they
entrust with the angrier part of their personality will have to be
someone that they consider trustworthy, it can’t just be anyone. But
whomever they do become close to, they will likely choose to become as
close as possible with that person, not holding anything back once the
person has demonstrated that they can be trusted and that they will not
reject them for their anger. But always there will be a little bit of
fear that those close persons might reject them anyway one day. That
the next time they get angry, the person might just decide that they
don’t want to deal with them anymore. That’s the fear that keeps them
from formulating new close connections and it is the fear that haunts
them when they interact with the ones they are already close to.In contrast the high-threshold person is likely to find it less risky
to formulate close connections or connections of any kind for that
matter. So they are likely to form a lot of them and not hold them to
any prerequisite tests before they allow the persons to become close to
them. Connections are trusted implicitly and don’t have to prove it
before they become close. However, a high-threshold person will likely
try not to become too close to any of the people with whom they become
connected. There is a need there to be able to quickly terminate or
temporarily withdraw from a connection should the high-threshold person
start to feel that they will be unable to keep their angry side in
check around that person. And should the high threshold person
formulate close connections that will be difficult or impossible to
terminate, one can expect the person to be forever a little bit afraid
that they might not be able to keep back that part of themselves that
only comes out in those rare instances where their anger threshold is
breached from the persons with whom they are close. The fear then is
that those close connections will see that other side of them, become
shocked and appalled and reject them out of hand. That fear would haunt
their efforts to develop deep connections.So one type of person doesn’t ever fully trust anyone else. The other
type of person doesn’t ever fully trust themselves. It’s a little sad.What does all this mean for all of us regular people? Well it means
that you might as well get used to dealing with anger, because there’s
a good chance you will encounter a lot of people getting angry at you
for no explicable reason in your lifetime. Strangers will explode at
you for no reason when they are avoiding demonstrating that anger to
others they care about. Close ones will rage at you as a means of
release because you are the person that they trust enough to get angry
at. You can’t escape it. You just accept it.Can you change your anger threshold? I’m sure it is possible. But it
wouldn’t be an easy or quick process by any means. Likely it would take
a lot of effort to try and give yourself a more balanced aspect. Also,
a lot of the things we do when we think we are trying to change our
anger threshold, like holding back our anger from strangers or close
ones probably isn’t really changing our threshold at all. We are
moderating the behaviors associated with the angers but not controlling
the underlying causes that make us either too quick or too slow to come
to our anger. Identifying what those causes are is the trick. That’s
the key.Anyway, in case you are wondering which I am… well I’ve always
thought of myself as a high-threshold anger person. I do frequently try
and escape when things really deeply upset and find outlets where I can
rant without anyone I know being around to see it. Others have also
remarked to me in the past that nothing seems to really upset me very
much and that I don’t ever get angry. But that’s not the whole story
really. When I think about it, its totally true that events and people
rarely make me angry. Even terrible travesties of justice I have
observed don’t really make me rage, nor cruelty, nor incompetence, nor
uncontrolled natural disasters, nor random bad luck. I sometimes
‘rant’ about these things in writing, but I’m not angry. There’s no
heat or coldness inside me in my reaction to these things. It’s more of
an inquisitiveness. I just wonder why they came to pass, I don’t become
disgusted or appalled.However, I do have a low anger-threshold with respect to one thing.
Myself. I get angry at myself very very easily. Any little thing that I
do wrong can make me want to scream or rage or beak something. A red
haze covers my eyes. I burn with the self disgust and repulsion. And it
takes a long time for me to get over that anger if I ever do. I still
have memories of stupid little mistakes from my childhood that haunt
me. I constantly remember them. I can’t seem to put them out of my
head. Whenever I do something I dislike, I become angry about the whole
sum total of errors I’ve made throughout my life. They all come back to
me and I want to hurt something or somebody. It’s a very strange
feeling.So I guess I exist on both ends of the spectrum a the same time. I
guess that gives me a little bit of a unique perspective. Anyway, that
just means I’ve got a lot of work to do in changing myself. I’d better
get cracking.
Comments (3)
“However, I do have a low anger-threshold with respect to one thing. Myself. I get angry at myself very very easily. Any little thing that I do wrong can make me want to scream or rage or beak something. A red haze covers my eyes. I burn with the self disgust and repulsion. And it takes a long time for me to get over that anger if I ever do. I still have memories of stupid little mistakes from my childhood that haunt me.”
Were you beaten rather physically hard as a child? Even harsh words that were said to you that were meant to define you, even nail you down to the floor where you stand.
This is hard and so damned easy. Part 1, get naked. Stand before a full body mirror and take time each day to look at yourself…not to see what is right or wrong, good or bad…get past all of that, and just see what is, how many veins are in your left hand, scars, which way things flop and fall..allow it to be…wait for things to come in this time and space…you are listening for voices(no not self induced schizoid voices or even audible things) rather, the first thought that comes to your head…follow that thought, see if you can find a person that through something they said or did actually reminded you of that thought..it is a process that seems easy, yet, over time, you can find a way to look at all parts of your body in the mirror and find only your voice speaking…again, without comparison, without evaluation..just hey, this is me, this is what I got…accepting it as that and nothing more…
Bringing this “guarded” practice into the everyday, in every conversation you have with someone, look at how every part of it really relates to you, and why, so that in every conversation, it is almost like all of your words are pointing back at you…on a subconscious level, you are openly comparing yourself with everyone you meet, and your first assumption is that every person you meet is whole and perfect…and you are not…it is there…denial or not..it is..for then, you are hard on yourself and even the most subtle elements of conversation bring out a “subreality” based upon your internal self evaluation techniques you have acquired…how can people more or less “get you” if you have not “gotten yourself” and once you do, what other people do or don’t do doesn’t mean shit. It never did. They never cared, they cannot for they are lost in the illusion that they are somehow defined by their past as well in one way or another.
The past is not real. It happened but it does not exist. Just like the living people and the consciousness they hold, in passing they no longer exist, you cannot make up with a dead person, you cannot wrong a right done to a dead person…so it is with the past, it is dead…really, somehow holding onto the past in a way is like necrophilia, you are fucking yourself with dead things in one way or another.
Also, think of the rules of social behavior. Suppose they do not fit you…does that mean you do not “fit in”? Be yourself, be authentically you. Get to know that, then, when necessary, find the masks that serve you best but before donning them, understand that they are not you, they will never be, they are more or less a communicative bridge to other people who more or less you can only observe really…most of the world has a “certain way” people are expected to behave…so, people have to change and adapt who they are based on this…in so doing, they change their nature to something external, esoteric and not at all in tune with their true self…the difference in the lie and the truth of ourselves is the greatest source of anger and likewise mainly because in what we have believed is love, and in what we have believed is a great life lesson being told to us as children, is more or less donning a lie and believing it is you…so as to more or less “fit in”.
randomly…
Hi.
“Were you beaten rather physically hard as a child”
No.
My apologies. Judging from your response I chose my words poorly and rereading the paragraph in question I see that I exaggerated considerably. All I meant to suggest is that my anger threshold with regards to myself is lower than I have observed it being for most people.
This is like how one person might get extremely annoyed when they get stuck in traffic whereas another person might not be bothered by the experience in the least. Their anger thresholds differ.
Similarly for me, if someone were to accidentally lock my keys in my car leaving me stranded in the middle of nowhere miles away from my home or any civilized location, it wouldn’t bother me very much. Really it wouldn’t. However, if I were to lock my keys in my car and all it meant is I had to walk two minutes from the parking lot back to my apartment to get my spare keys, it would piss me off a great deal.
This does not necessarily imply a deep seated self hatred or any permanent debilitating emotional scarring any more than the person’s anger at being stuck in traffic implies any kind of subconscious hatred of automobiles, or traffic, or other drivers, or events beyond their control. It could be any of those things at the root of the anger, or it could be a hundred thousand other things not the least of which might just be because the person has things to do and just has a natural disposition of being a person who doesn’t particularly like being delayed.
What I mean to say is that I don’t think there is anything inherently wrong with getting angry. It isn’t in all people a sort of disorder or disease that needs to be cured. There are those who have emotional disorders for whom a low anger threshold is a symptom, and for all I know I may be one of them, but it doesn’t follow from the existence of a low anger threshold that one has such a disorder.
I think it is dangerous for us to judge others on the basis of their anger as if anger was an evil thing that needs to be gotten rid of in and of itself. It isn’t. Anger is as natural as breathing. We don’t need to go through great efforts to try and make sure we don’t get angry or to ensure that we do. What we do need to do is look at those experiences that make up who we are and come to an understanding of them and then figure out who we want to be.
Anyway, I think the strategies you suggest are quite interesting and they are worth thinking about. I especially like this part:
“..how can people more or less “get you” if you have not “gotten
yourself” and once you do, what other people do or don’t do doesn’t
mean shit. It never did. “
I think that makes a lot of sense. Self understanding does help one to avoid feeling bound by the expectations and perception of others.
But I’m not all that sure about all that “past doesn’t exist” stuff. There is a kind of basic truth to it to be sure, but I don’t find it very helpful to think in this way. The past is very real to most of us in the here and now. Sometimes our memories of our past are more real to us than the present. The memories haunt us like ghosts. And just like if a real ghost inhabits your apartment, simply telling it it isn’t real probably won’t make it go away. You have to call in the ghost busters.
Anyway, thanks for the comment!
I saw that background and thought it cool having a mandala and sort of a repetitive element…mandalbots..I know the term now…
the past is surely a guidepost, but hopefully not a prison for the present…I am more than a staunch anti-Calvinist of sorts..
as far as ghosts go..how are they not more or less “thought forms” much like the tulpas whereby the haunting is more or less an outflowing from their creation altogether…
I appreciate your openness and what seems like a good resistance to some finality…after all..we still are..even what we are is often more unknown than certain…but the potential of what could be..in the middle of these movements, in storms of emotion and in sunlit laiden joys..we are steering the ship based on so many things that have been allopoetically put into us…like a computer having a programmer, once the program is written and finished, then the computer can carry them out, once prompted….could anger be such a prompt to create a certain “program” to enact in us?
good conversation mate…thank you..