The suggestion was made that I write about my opinion about the Gay Marriage vs Civli Unions issue and considering the recent debate on Xanga’s front page about similar topics I thought it a good issue to approach.
The basic question was this, do I think that Civil Unions are an acceptable compromise. An interesting question. Hmm, let me this as succinctly and clearly and simply as I can.
FUCK NO!!!!
It is not acceptable. It is not tolerable. It is not ok. It is not alright. It’s fucking idiotic and the very idea of compromising on basic human rights would make me throw up if I weren’t too consumed with my violent urge to throttle the people who suggest it.
We clear?
Maybe you think I’m being a little uncharitable, a bit unfair. Well that’s OK. I’m not in a particularly charitable mood today. I’m not in the mood to coddle selfish arrogant pricks whose only real problem with Gay people is that to admit that they are the same as everyone else would require them to feel bad about every lame prejudiced gay-joke they ever made while growing up. Aww, what a shame!
Basically, I’ve only ever heard two even half way reasonable pleas for the Civil Unions compromise. Almost everyone else is just hiding behind a thin syntactical membrane to hide their obvious grotesque prejudice. They’re all “we don’t want you to marry, but we’re not prejudiced because we’re ok with Civil Unions.” Bullshit. They only are ok with civil unions because if they admitted to not being for it, they’d have to admit to being no better than Nazi’s, slave owners and chauvinist pigs. It’s exactly like people who said they were perfectly ok with black people just so long as they don’t have to eat at the same table with them or share a bathroom. What’s wrong with separate but equal anyway? Bullshit.
Now the “good” arguments and I use that word extremely lightly. One argument, the best argument really, comes in the form of those heartfelt pleas by people who are homosexual who believe that this is a matter of rights. They really don’t give a shit about the larger moral implications. They just want to be able to have the same rights with regards to their significant others and their children as other married couples have. They don’t give a damn what it’s called, they just want to be treated the same. And these people, generally think well why not just call it civil unions if that gets the job done? Many of these people don’t really care much for the historical underpinnings or religious undertones of marriage anyway. In their mind this is a legal matter. It’s a question of the best possible strategy to ensure that they get the rights they want. Do you use the term marriage or civil union? To them it depends on which works.
And that argument makes a lot of sense right? I mean from their perspective yeah if they get the rights to be treated the same however that comes about all the better right? Let’s compromise!
The problem is, I hate to break it to them, but this issue isn’t just about them. It’s as much or more about the rest of us. Those people who call themselves straight and pretend to care about rights and freedom but still can’t bring themselves to attend a gay rights rally because that means god forbid they might have to stand next to a queer person. Those of us who claim that we’ve moved beyond prejudice on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation and yet still can’t help but squirm when they see a gay couple kissing or make a big deal about a main character in a story happening to be gay. That’s the problem. It’s about our capacity, as a peoples, for tolerance and acceptance and justice. That’s what we want to improve.
It’s about our culture growing to the point where we as a whole actually do not think of homosexuality as an aberrant characteristic. That’s what matters. And I’d fight for that even if the mechanism to obtain it meant that it denied particular gay people from getting their immediate access to rights related to marriage. I don’t give a shit about who gets to share health care with their significant others or not. (the health care system is sick and broken anyways) I care MUCH MORE about what we THINK about one another.
As far as that larger struggle goes, the question of marriage versus civil union isn’t just a trivial insignificant word choice difference, it’s essential.
You hear a lot of bullshit about how the battle for gay marriage isn’t comparable to the battle for civil rights during the 60′s. That’s total crap and I don’t even feel like dignifying it with a serious response. However, if what you mean is that there is a fundamental difference between being ‘black’ and being ‘gay’ well gee what a fucking surprise you know? Yeah I have to agree black!=gay.
It’s mind numbingly obvious of course, but it isn’t insignificant to contemplate. Gay rights are as much a struggle for rights and equality as any other struggle for rights and equality on the basis of race or gender or disability or anything else. But each of these struggles is different. And it’s important to understand and contemplate their differences. In fact in the question of gay marriage the obvious and far too unspoken difference in characteristics between these struggles actually reveals the very reason why gay marriage is a big deal. In fact it’s one of the biggest deals.
Because as much as people want to skirt around the fact, being gay is a matter related to SEX. Yeah I know black!=gay, gay is about sex, I’m full of shocking declarations today aren’t I? But the distinguishing characteristics of being gay is related to differences in sexuality, sexual identity, and sexual preferences. That’s really it. Just as much as skin color is the primary distinguishing characteristic of being considered “black”. (as opposed to being descended from slaves or from Africa which some idiots claim)
Now, let’s put our thinking caps on. What institution, in our society, has for countless generations been the primary vehicle and symbol of sexual behavioral acceptance? Gee I wonder what? I give up. Oh wait, could it maybe be marriage that I’m getting at? No way it couldn’t be! Oh wait. OF COURSE IT FUCKING IS!
For many, rightly or wrongly, marriage is the passage into adulthood and acceptance. It’s the symbolism that says you are an adult, accepted pairing in the society capable and approved of creating and raising children. It’s been this way for ages. Why is sex outside of marriage, still, in many circles a matter of contention? Because people have been raised to think that marriage is what validates sex. Unmarried, you are seen as neither mature enough nor sufficiently chained to social tradition to be able to make rational decisions about who you are sleeping with. We allow people to do it as a society, but then we turn our noses up at it, calling those people who do so derogatory names when it’s out in the open while carefully sweeping it under the rug in ‘accepted’ social collectives. In contrast, “married” people are judged adults who can do what they want together in the privacy of their own home no questions asked, mind your own business. Fucking outside of marriage is seen as a sign of immaturity, childishness, and impropriety.
And that should illuminate quite clearly one of the biggest struggles the gay rights movements face. People still have a tendency to perceive being homosexual as less a matter of genetic disposition and more a matter of childish choice. Many people, though they’ll never admit it openly, see people who are homosexual as immature children who are playing around and need to grow up and admit to their “true” sexuality. Many perceive being homosexual as a kind of joke, an object of humor or ridicule not as an acceptable way of being. Others perceive it as a thing done by creepy outsiders who they don’t really want to accept into the greater society anyways.
And that, any idiot should be able to see is WRONG. Why should homosexuality be associated with youth? Your sexual identity doesn’t disappear as you grow older. A 40 or 50 year old homosexual ought to be as accepted a member as society as a 20 year old. People don’t “grow out” of their genetic code. And certainly there’s nothing about girls liking girls and guys liking guys that makes anyone into a creep. There’s plenty of heterosexual people who do a good job of being creepy and weird all on their own. But they can get married and it’ll be applauded.
You know when I first found out that gay marriage was a controversy I was very literally surprised. I really hadn’t ever thought about it before. I just kinda assumed that anyone could marry whoever they wanted. I was naive. I just thought homosexuals didn’t want to marry by and large and nobody had ever tried. But I never thought the law would deny them that right and I assumed that if they wanted to people would be fine with it. I never imagined people would be up in arms about it. I never thought people would actually vote to deny people that right. I mean why the Hell would anyone do that I thought? What the fuck does their marrying have to do with you?!?
It was a long time before I came to really understand what this struggle is about. There’s no accident that people are sooo very opposed to ‘marriage’ for gay people. It’s because being gay IS about sexuality. If you allow gay people to marry, then they really are just like you. They’re in adult acceptable relationships. It becomes as acceptable as any other marriage. Just like when two heterosexual kids run off together and live together in a romantic relationship people keep deluding themselves into thinking its temporary and insignificant, an act of childish immaturity right up until they get married and parents are forced to see their children as being adults. Marriage is a right of passage. It’s a gateway to permanent social propriety backed by the full force of the law. But people want to keep thinking of gay relationships as perpetually permanently improper, unacceptable, and temporary. Oh of course people *hate* the idea of making it legal.
If we compromise with marriage and call it civil unions many people will smugly continue to think of it as different. They’ll see homosexual relationships as something other into which they can place their own flawed and false and absurd belief structures. Those two are in a civil union, but at least they aren’t married. Why should we let them hide behind that syntactic sugar that makes people like that feel better?
Which brings me to the second argument that is halfway decent. In this argument smart people say, look, we know the idea of marriage makes people uncomfortable. So let’s not rock the boat. Let’s allow them their absurd misconceptions and advocate a softer gentler approach called “civil unions” that won’t upset them and get their back up and cause them to fight back. Then slowly, over time as civil unions become common and people get to know people who are adult, mature, families raising children but just happen to be of the same gender in a civil union relationship they’ll see it’s, you know, the same as marriage and they’ll all unbeknownst to them start to equate it to marriage in their small little brains. And in the end the two terms will be effectively equivalent to society. And besides the old people who are against it will eventually die out and young people are much more likely to accept gay marriage. Over time the civil union language and marriage language will merge and we’ll all live happily ever after.
In other words this argument is about pragmatic compromise in the present as a gateway to an inevitable long term future. Advocates say let’s get what we can right now, civil unions, and slowly work our way up to more. Often they also say this is the only reasonable strategy because it’s just as important to respect the different view points of others even if we don’t agree with you and try and understand the tightly ingrained social attitudes that are a part of who they are. It’s arrogant to try and force them to change their views.
To that I say, FUCK THAT SHIT! I don’t WANT to understand the social attitudes of bigots. I don’t give a shit about how you grew up and blah blah blah that makes you continue to mock and ridicule people who are different from you. I don’t want to hear your sob story that makes you think you have a right to deny others their basic rights.
Take this for an example, undoubtedly it’s a matter of some serious important academic interest to understand where White Supremacy and Antisemitism comes from and what leads people to be that way. But if you’re a Jew in the middle of the holocaust, that’s rather insignificant to you right now. Actually if you’re ANYONE witnessing the holocaust it’s meaningless. Nobody cares where these attitudes CAME from. Not then and now. We just want them to fucking change it.
I don’t care if making arguments like this makes people uncomfortable. I WANT them to be uncomfortable. I want them to open their fucking minds and hearts to their fellow human beings. And if in the process of doing so that requires some deep introspection and realization of your own internal sick, unfair, and unacceptable biases, SO BE IT! That’s what I want. That’s what I think we should ALL want. Why in the hell is it such a huge problem to make people feel bad when they are in fact in the wrong!?!?
It’s not that hard you know. It takes all of two seconds to change your mind and say okay, gay marriage is fine by me. It’s not like it hurts you to do so. Well maybe it hurts your pride if you’ve staked your miserable reputation on decrying gay people. Oh God no! Excuse me while I go cry myself to sleep over your intense suffering.
It’s not hard to see that people are in fact wholly capable of stopping at any moment spouting the bullshit anti-gay marriage arguments that are so mind numbingly stupid they want me want to weep to hear that homosapiens are capable of formulating them. I mean really? drug abuse, teen pregnancy, sex outside of wedlock, prostitution, incest, polygamy, bestiality? Really? You think these things seriously turn on the question of gay marriage? You really think that being gay gives people some genetic disposition to be bad people and bad parents? You really think that there’s some special magic about having a male and female parent that makes kids turn out a-okay? You really think that generations of kids will suddenly all be “doomed” to being gay or bi or trans just because you allowed gay marriage to be allowed? Really? Honestly?
GROW UP!
Just possibly it just might be that allowing civil unions as a compromise will work out ok. I mean we can see society changing and becoming more tolerant by the day. Younger generations more and more are accepting of sexual differences. But even so I never really was too fond of the wait for the bad and/or dumb people to die strategy. That never seems to work out, especially since the dumb people aren’t ever nearly as dumb as you think and the bad people always tend to stick around to spread their bullshit a lot longer than you ever imagined they would. Not to mention the sheer practical concerns that civil unions will in fact likely leave lots of legal loop holes that have to be challenged on a case by case basis. And the even more pressing concern that in the mean time while we’re ‘waiting’ for people to grow up and realize they’ve been being morons about this for the past few years, people are workign to pass constitutional amendments designed to explicitly restrict the rights of gays to marriage. Such things are exceedingly hard to overturn and for good reason. Messing around and striving for less than full marriage rights could very well all opponents to push back the struggle for generations. This is no time for complacency.
But even beyond that there’s a deeper question here. To me it’s not an issue of can society accept a Civil Unions compromise. It isn’t even a question of whether doing so will work in terms of securing rights for homosexual couples. It’s not whether compromise is ok. It’s that we SHOULDN’T HAVE TO.
Nobody should have to compromise to appease bigots and brats and arrogant self-centered bastards who think they have the right to dictate how YOU live. FUCK THAT SHIT Fuck it sideways with some sort of indescribably large painful object. YOU are the bad guys. You may well be an otherwise good and productive members of society, but in THIS you are dead wrong. IF you think being gay is a sufficient justification for denying people the same fundamental terminology you use for other “real” people, you’re being a evil shithead, and you need to fucking stop.
THAT’s what I believe with regards to gay marriage vs civil unions. This is a civil rights issue. It’s not a special case. And we have to stop pretending that you can fix a matter of justice without making anyone feel bad.
This entry was based on a suggested writing topic by
elvesdoitbetter. Suggest more stuff for me to write about
here.
(originally posted April 15,2009)