Month: April 2011

  • Royal Elevation

    You have to elevate something. That’s just a fact. If you don’t elevate anything how will you have an excuse to throw a big party?

    I mean really after yearly birth day parties, anniversaries, graduations, Christmas, New Years’s, Valentine’s Day, the Super Bowl, the World Cup, the Olympics, various sports playoffs, the occasional promotion, and family and friend weddings, funerals, births, graduations and reunions, people quickly realize that there just aren’t enough excuses to throw a party in one’s life. 

    When you’re young you don’t have to worry about this. Everybody expects you to occasionally throw or attend completely random parties thrown for no apparent reason whatsoever. Indeed many a school encourages it by orchestrating such random and arbitrary party throwing (though I suspect that is done as much for the teachers and administrators than for the students).

    But when you’re an adult well you aren’t supposed to party just willy nilly. You have to have a reason. It’s gotta be a holiday, a religious ceremony, or a sporting event. Or something directly related to family. Those are pretty much the only acceptable partying excuses for adults. Sometimes an adult will step out of line and celebrate something unorthodox like the quitting of a much hated job or retirement, or maybe moving into a new home, or Friday night poker night, or getting that fancy piece of furniture you always wanted… but these are quite clearly looked down upon as an indulgence. You can do it once in a while but too often and people will start to look at you funny and ask questions. What’s the matter with you? Stop acting like a kid! Grow up already!

    Yes being an adult is just hard. You just can’t party as much as you’d like. So many of us live in this prison of unfulfilled partying desires. What are we to do?

    The answer, ELEVATE something! Look you can’t just celebrate some random arbitrary person’s wedding or birthday. Everybody would know then that you were just using it as an excuse to party. But if you ELEVATE someone to a position of pre-eminence and importance than that’s different. Then well, everybody knows that when something significant happens to THEM it’s an event of momentous historic proportions. We can’t let such a big opportunity go to waste right?  We have to throw a REALLY BIG PARTY!  In fact we better make it a MONSTROUS GARGANTUAN PARTY to make up for all the missing party opportunities we’ve been lacking. And you don’t even have to worry about making sure enough people show up. The whole WORLD is invited!

    The British people know this well, as this morning they engaged in their regular ritual of elevating some people of a particular blood line to a level of great significance so as to give the people an excuse to hold a monstrous gargantuan once in a life time party!  And by all accounts it went well. People who cared had fun and enjoyed themselves. People who wanted something to gripe about got something to gripe about. It was a win for all around.

    Though some party poopers brought up some sort of weird meta-philosophical issues. Cuz of course party time is always the best place for deep questions of social and philosophical significance as everyone knows.  They asked such questions as does it really make sense to elevate people into such fame and significance solely on the basis of their bloodline? Is this moral or just? And what about the wealth factor? What about the dark and dreaded history of the British Empire. yadda yadda yadda.

    To be sure the answer to these questions is of course no. We SHOULDN’T be elevating people based on solely who their parents are. That’s dumb. Everybody knows it’s dumb. Big fricking deal. You aren’t a genius wise man in a sea of fools for pointing out this one apparent obvious fact that anyone with two brain cells to rub together can figure out. What you are is being annoying. Don’t you get it? People want to PARTY. It’s that simple really. And geez can’t they party for once without your damn morality and ethics getting in the way of every little decision they make?

    I mean think about it, it COULD be worse. In fact, it IS worse. Take a look at the United States. We elevate all KINDS of people here for oh so many bad reasons. We elevate the President elect every 4 years giving them a totally full head that can’t possibly help them govern well so that we can hold a gigantic party on the national mall in honor of winning or swindling a voting contest. We elevate NUMEROUS people every year for being good at pretending to be people we think we’d like in television and movie and we hold nice parties to give them shiny trophies in honor of how good pretenders they are. We elevate people whose job it is to give us the news so they can have a yearly party with the other elevated elites heedless of how much this association undoubtedly influences and corrupts their ability to do the news. We elevate people for being good singers. We elevate people for being good at sports. We elevate people for earning millions by being brutal exploiters of workers. We even elevate those of us must skilled in presenting strategies to conquer and control the masses. 

    Perhaps worst of all we elevate some people out of pure morbid fascination and unremarkable curiosity. We elevate some ‘reality stars’ for no apparent reason other than that we find them mock worthy and ridiculous. Heck we elevate buffoons like Donald Trump just because they are loud and obnoxious enough to say patently false things that shock us.

    In short we have our own aristocracy nearly as arbitrary in its construction as that of birthright and in some ways worse since qualification oft entails anti-virtues like greed, intolerance, stubbornness, and relentless aggression. This hardly matters. They often still serve as excellent excuses for party throwing, take for example Glenn Beck’s rally on the national mall.  Quite a nice party that. Or for that matter, Jon Stewart’s.

    This happens everywhere. It’s not just us thank god. Make no mistake there’s plenty of elevation of dictators and demagogues throughout the world. Dear Leaders are praised and worshiped by their people who are oft even more starved of opportunity to party than those of us in the West. Is it any surprise that they jump at the opportunity to celebrate their dictator’s every major pronouncement?

    Now the philosophers amongst you might put for a theoretical concept that even if we do have to elevate something it doesn’t mean we have to elevate things so arbitrarily and often badly. And you’re right. There’s at least two clear as day better ways to go about it.

    One is we could elevate people based on virtues.  That is we would eschew the normal elevation of people based on blood, money, success, power, celebrity, anti-virtue, or morbid fascination and instead substitute things we as a people decide we really care about.  You know, things like honor and courage and justice and wisdom and reason. Or how about elevating people on the basis of compassion and tolerance and the desire to help people? How about elevating people who exhibit the most selflessness and the greatest willingness to sacrifice for others and for the furthering of virtues and the greater Good?  We could you know. In theory.

    We even do do a little bit of this. We elevate Martin Luther King and give him a holiday. We don’t hold very much of a party on his birthday, so it kinda goes to show how small the elevation is compared to sports stars and princess marriages, but it is at least SOME elevation on the grounds that he was a virtuous and deserving person. We COULD do a lot more like this. Maybe we don’t celebrate when “the Prince” gets married, but we celebrate when someone of extreme virtue who sacrificed a lot to bring peace and to help people, gets married.  That person could be the Prince… or it could be a random dude in a town in the middle of nowhere.  Identification remains a problem but hardly an insurmountable one.

    The other idea is to eschew the idea of elevating people altogether and elevate ideas and concepts that matter. There’s no reason why we can’t elevate say Evolution to a celebratory thing or the theory of Gravity or the Internet. We could even elevate the ideas of the virtues themselves. Why not have a Generosity day? Or an honesty day? We could elevate events as well, like the day we first achieved flight or the amazing accomplishment of reaching the moon.

    We do do a little bit of these non-people elevations now. But they seem particularly small and drowned out by the elevation of celebrity and stardom. We hardly pay a lick of attention to the anniversary of the end of world war II even though to be sure it was an event worth elevating.

    Of course there’s another idea too but it requires a drastic sacrifice on people’s part. So much a sacrifice that I don’t think it all likely. That is we could just stop elevating everything. The result, much fewer excuses to party. This is so far beyond the realms of likelihood it’s hardly worth mentioning. But it COULD happen. We could all become the types of people who wear all black and write poetry about how nothing matters and nothing is real and believe unitedly that there’s no point in elevating anything ever.

    But… although I don’t like parties, most humans do enjoy their parties a great deal. I think it must be some sort of genetic disposition ingrained in many of us (though don’t ask what that says about me).  And but so.. I don’t really think it likely that we’ll abandon our chance at eking out a few extra parties in our life and stop elevating things altogether.

    So given that I’d say fine. Let’s go ahead and enjoy our parties and keep on elevating as we’ve been doing. But slowly let’s try, TRY to transition to a world where we start elevating people on the basis of virtues and then eventually to a world where we elevate the virtues themselves without the need of a human symbol attached to them. Then one day we’ll reach a point where we can party all the time and never feel an ounce of guilt. 

    We’ll all be Kings and Queens of our destiny! To the future! Cheers!

  • Keynes vs Hayek

    Perhaps surprisingly, I really really like these videos:

     

     

     

    The first of these videos has the more clear references to actual economic theory and is really sort of a masterpiece. The second one has catchier music and excellent production quality, but is much less informative. Still, maybe it proves how much of a nerd I am, cuz I greatly enjoyed them both.

    I’m no economist, but I suspect the central conceit (though perhaps a necessary conceit) of both of these videos is the idea that Economics is somehow stuck in this deep fatal war between Keynes and Hayek. The idea that we must choose one or the other or else! Only one can be true. There can’t be even a whiff of truth in the other. One will stand. One will fall.

    If I had to choose between these extremes I’d choose Keynes, though I think Hayek makes some good points. But I think judging by the video I’d much rather hang out with Hayek and couldn’t stand five minutes around Keynes. Nevertheless, that’s not really the reality we live in. Nobody, I hope, is advocating purely following the will of Keynes or Hayek.

    In reality the theory of economics is far more vast and interesting than these two albeit extremely influential chains.  Mill, Bagehot, Wicksell, Fisher, Friedman, Tobin… There’s a LOT of economic theory and it builds on each other in meaningful and important ways. It’s inconceivable to me that modern economists are simply trying to force the government to choose between following Hayek’s vision and Keynes’s vision. In reality I suspect theories are much more complex and recommendations are rooted in more than just these explanations.

    That being said, I’m not at all sure economists know what the heck is going on now either. I think we know a lot more than we did in the past, but that doesn’t equate to certain knowledge. However, I just don’t think it’s the ignorance of our economic theory that’s our core problem. We aren’t stuck on one or the other wrong evolutionary track.  Rather I think the problems are 3:

    1. Not all of economists who speak authoritatively and are listened to and influence policy are actually knowledgeable or as knowledgeable as they claim to be in the body of economic theory to date. This is a huge failure of education.

    2. Those economists who ARE knowledgeable about the theory of economics, at least the best that we’ve got in that regard, are not listened to, or even in some cases highly regarded by the people who are in charge of making policy.

    3. Often there are ideological motivators that are infleuncing decision making that have nothing to do with the theory or the body of knowledge we have developed.

    I might consider adding a fourth that the public is also too lacking in a basic understanding of that theory sufficient to make sound judgments about whether or not we are abiding by it.

     

    In short, I think what’s happening in economics is roughly equivalent to what’s happening in Climate Change.  The economics profession has started to be treated as if it lacks credibility and the least credible amongst them are being elevated to positions of influence beyond their knowledge or ability.

    Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think even the best economists are perfect and I’m sure, sure they have gotten things vastly wrong and will get things vastly wrong in the future, even the best and the brightest of them.  But I’d rather put my future in the hands of those economists who are well trained, well versed, intelligent and knowledgible about the history and theory of economics than I would in just random chance or cowering away and just letting things happen. And I’d CERTAINLY trust them a lot more than some of the ideologues who seem to have outsized influence today and are driving things based on ideological concerns and not fact or principal or science.

    But what seems to be happening today is that we are trending away from a belief in fact and a belief in knowledge and fact in general.  We ignore Climate Change. We question evolution. We doubt the birth certificate evidence of our own eyes. We question 9/11. Conspiracy theories thrive in their stead.

    And the deep problem underlying that erosion of belief in fact and knowledge is a parallel erosion in our trust for one another. We’ve become so partisan that we can barely talk to one another without malice. We’ve become much more geographically, economically, racially,  and socially segregated that we are willing to admit in or refusal to give up the conceits of the mixing pot. The gap between generations stands wider than ever. Our scientists are seen as liars, our politicians as opportunists, our military and police as draconians, our doctors and lawyers as thieves, our media figures as children playing games, our clergymen as threats to our children, our businessmen as crooks, and our economists as fools. To be sure many if not all of these institutions have not performed admirably in recent years. However, though there is certainly good reason to doubt them, we run wholesale away from them at our great peril. There has to be a way to reform these institutions and to reform our perception of them so that they can become again the pilars on which a functional society is built. And at the same time we need to change the way we perceive each other so that we can start to work together to create a better future again.

     

    If we need to create some more fun rap videos to encourage more people to care about and think about knowledge in general as a valuable goal in and of itself, then I’m all for it. I’m 100% on board with these even though I think they are clearly tilted more in the direction I don’t agree with. Maybe these kinds of things can get us to talking with one another about things more momentous than a birth certificate in a fair and rational way again.

    Keep at it. I want to see more fun creativity like this. Biology, Physics, Politics, Philosophy, History, Sociology. All of it. We need it.

  • Believe Birtherism Now

    Snoglefallwick… groksbregabon…  ignafsnigg…

    *cough* *cough*

    ahem.

     

    Dear sirs and gentlewomen.

    Submitted for your approval, it has come to my attention that there is a grave crises in your world… ur… I mean our world.  It seems that not enough of… of us have acknowledged the fundamental undeniable truth that Barack Obama is a secret muslim born in Kenya.

    According to recent polling only 11% of you have acknowledged the truth, and only 16% more are even considering the possibility. I do not understand why you have not yet accepted it as truth!!!!!! Are you all a bunch of blognsotchs!!!!! 

    No matter, I will now try to allay any doubts you may have remaining. Heed me.

    Many of your great and wise leaders have acknowledged this claim and expressed it publicly.

    Donald Trump:

     

    Charlie Sheen:

    Talking about a possible presidential run — Sheen defeated Obama amongst GOP voters in the same polls as his victories of Palin — he mused about the idea and then hit the birther sweet spot.

    “For starters, I was f**king born here, how about that? And I got proof! Nothing photoshopped about my birth certificate,” Sheen said

    link

     

    Sarah Palin:

     

    These are your leaders. It is known that they are genetically designed to be perfectly suited to persuade you of all things. They are perfectly suited to be your next overlords. Since they say that this is true you must believe. Believe them. Now. That is all.

    shzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    It has come to my argup— *cough*  attention that many you do not yet believe. You have been foolishly convinced by such arguments as the follows:

    • Presidents are not required to produce their birth certificate, long form or otherwise. No other President has been subjected to such an inquiry, so why President Obama?
    • There has never been a single credible piece of affirmative evidence suggesting that Barack Obama was born anywhere other than where he said he was.
    • Barack Obama released his Birth Certificate in July of 2008 to numerous press organizations AND posted a scanned copy of it online. You can view the copy they scanned here.
    • The Birth Certificate Obama released is the exact same type you would get if you lived in Hawaii and requested your birth certificate. It is sufficient for purposes of getting a passport, a license, or any other purpose you might need a birth certificate for. It fully meets the State Department’s requirements for a birth certificate.
    • The birth certificate Obama produced is both signed and has a serial number and a seal contrary to conspiracy theorests claims. Factcheck.org released high resolution scans after having been provided the certificate here. Other news organizations have confirmed and photographed the certificate such as NBC in this news story here.
    • While the Birth Certificate the President produced was indeed labeled “Certification of Live Birth” that is not unusual. Hospitals do indeed sometimes create a long form or original birth certificate that contains additional information such as birth weight or parents home town, but it is not what is kept by the State or issued to citizens for the purpose of proving citizenship. Hawaii’s laws prevent the issuing of copies of these “long form birth certificates”. The Certification of Live Birth is for all legal purposes a person’s birth certificate.
    • The federal Health Information Privacy Act of 1999 — a law passed to protect medical records from public scrutiny — prevents hospitals from confirming births directly
    • On July 28, 2009, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health certified that she had personally seen Barack Obama’s ORIGINAL birth certificate and made a statement to US Today. Specifally she said: “I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen.” Pretty hard to refute.
    • Hawaii’s Republican Governor from 2002-2010 Linda Lingle has adamantly disputed birther claims saying “…I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health.” Lingle added, ” … The president was in fact born at Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that’s just a fact.” link
    • Hawaii’s current Democratic Governor Neil Abercrombie stated that their investigation showed that OBama’s birth certificate was written in their archives
    • Two separate newspapers the Honolulu Adviser and the Honolulu Star Bulletin both printed birth announcements for Obama on August 13 and August 14, 1961 respectively. The information in the announcements they state that they got directly from the Hospitals and the announcements match including the address they list for Obama’s parents which in turn match State records. The Honolulu Adviser in response to the controversy went to their microfilmed archives, dug up the announcement and posted a copy online.
    • Politifact ranks Trump’s claim that nobody who went to school with Obama knew him as Pants on Fire false and cites evidence of over a dozen students and teachers who knew him during elementary school and many many more who knew him during later educational experiences.
    • “Joshua Wisch, a spokesman for the Hawaii attorney general’s office, noted that a public index of vital records, available for inspection in a bound volume at the Health Department’s Office of Health Status Monitoring, lists a male child named “Obama II, Barack Hussein” as having been born in the state.”  “Wisch, the spokesman for the attorney general’s office, said state law does not in fact permit the release of “vital records,” including an original “record of live birth” — even to the individual whose birth it records. “It’s a Department of Health record and it can’t be released to anybody,” he said. Nor do state laws have any provision that authorizes such records to be photocopied, Wisch said. If Obama wanted to personally visit the state health department, he would be permitted to inspect his birth record. But if he or anybody else wanted a copy of their birth records, they would be told to fill out the appropriate state form and receive back the same computer generated “certification of live birth” form that everybody else gets — which is exactly what Obama did four years ago. ” link
    • Claims that Obama spent $2 million hiding his birth certificate are false. They use the total number for all the President’s legal fees and conflate it with those used regarding birtherism
    • None of 17 law suits filed by December of 2008 (which might explain some of those legal fees) have resulted in any relief for plantiffs.
    • The argument that Obama’s paternal step-grandmother said he was born in Kenya is misleading. The full transcript and audio of the encounter with her reveals she repeatedly stated that Obama was born in Hawaii even after being badgered relentlessly to get her to say otherwise. The video was then cut off to make it seem like she said otherwise when in reality she was not understanding the question from the translator the first time it was asked.
    • The Kenyan Birth-Certificate release was a lie and a forgery. It shows The Republic of Kenya which didn’t exist at the time and a blogger admitted to creating the forgery based off an Australian birth certificate.
    • The argument that anyone can get a Short Form Birth Certificate from the State of Hawaii even if you were not born in Hawaii is misleading. While it’s true that anyone can do that, NOT anyone could get one that lists one’s place of birth as Hawaii. You actually have to be born in Hawaii to get a short form birth certificate that lists Hawaii a your place of birth, which Obama was.
    • It’s arguable that even IF Obama was not born in the United States he’d still meet the “natural born citizen” requirement of the constitution because legally “natural born” does not mean “born on US soil”. Having one parent who is a US citizen may be sufficient.
    • Obama did have dual citizenship with the United Kingdom and Colonies through his father but per their laws since he did not swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya and renounce his US citizenship upon reaching adulthood, therefore he lost his other citizenship.
    • Having a parent who is not a US citizen or having dual citizenship does not disqualify one for President. If it did, President Chester A. Arthur would also not have been eligible.
    • Even if the President were suddenly proven not to have been born in the US it would not change the fact that he lived most of his life here, it would not change his basic views or beliefs in the least, and it wouldn’t make him any less American in values or principles. It also would not change the fact that 53% of the American population voted for him and that he was officially elected by the electoral college and that he swore the Oath of Office as required by the Constitution. It wouldn’t make him any better or worse a President. In short where you are born does NOT determine what kind of person you are, nor should people be judged by their place of birth. And it is not fair to hold this President to a different standard of proving his “Americanness” than you hold others… including Arnold Schwarzenegger or John McCain.
    • If Obama had found a way around the law and released his Long Form Birth Certificate there’s no doubt the conspiracy theorests would say “what took him so long” and cliam it was a forgery anyway.  Indeed the birther mess was only fueled more by Obama’s release of his short form birth certificate. It was after that that the conspiracies exploded.
    • Most of the people who originated the Birther claims are in fact known to follow other major conspiracies: 

    “Not surprisingly, almost all of the people who’ve been most prominent in pushing this story have a history of conspiracist thought. There’s Jerome Corsi, who’s best known as the co-author of the book that launched the Swift boat vets; he’s a chief proponent of the claim that the government is secretly planning to form a “North American Union” with Canada and Mexico. Philip Berg, who filed the lawsuit that had until now drawn the most public attention, is a 9/11 Truther. Andy Martin, who’s credited with starting the myth that Obama is a Muslim and has been intimately involved in the birth certificate mess as well, was denied admission to the Illinois bar because of a psychiatric evaluation that showed he had “moderately severe character defect manifested by well-documented ideation with a paranoid flavor and a grandiose character.” He also has a long history of anti-Semitism. Robert Schulz, who’s responsible for the ads in the Tribune, is a fairly notorious tax protester. In 2007, a federal judge ordered Schulz to shutter his Web site because he and his organization were, in the words of the Justice Department’s Tax Division, using the site to promote “a nationwide tax-fraud scheme.”"   link

    • If President Obama was lying about anything related to his birth it’s nearly inconceivable that during the vetting process or the two vicious campaigns he went through none of it would have come out. Both Hilary Clinton and John McCain had people researching deeply into the President’s past trying to dig up anything that could give them an advantage. Why wouldn’t they have found something? Do people really think Donald Trump’s people would be better?
    • If the evidence that there was some kind of issue with the President’s birth was credible, why then have nearly all news outlets ignored it since 2008 after it was disputed the first time until now when Donald Trump has brought it back up without adding a single shred of new evidence?

     

    Such are the kinds of arguments your puny minds have grasped on to refute the obvious truth. I will not explain to you why all of the above is foolish human nonsense. Here goes.

    BARACK OBAMA WAS NOT A US CITIZEN!!!

    There. Now you must believe. All of our research has shown that weak human minds are convinced by those who shout the loudest.  Also I know that you.. ur WE humans believe greatly in being polite and taking people at their word. This is my word. You must take it.

    Thus I have won. No. I am #Winning. We are all #Winning. After all I am Nephyo, the greatest blogger to ever live and I have written a lengthy blog post. This should put this issue to rest and solve the crises for good.

    I Thank You and my Overlords thank you for your patience and consideration. SUBMIT TO US!!! Peace Out.

    Kellen